![]() ![]() Thanks to all which where supporting me in the last years in the xojo scene. In the behavior of xojo, in there Idea of changing stuffs and in the end also because xojo was not getting how to do stuffs correctly. If it is a complex app with rich functionality xojo will not be the right choice. ![]() So: how to decide for xojo? If it is a small Webapp, uploading or downloading some stuffs, xojo is a good solution for. Doing the same with C++ Linux wins all the time with at least 10% better performance. And with the compiled Software I have the same issues at the end: doing benchmarks with Linux and Windows, Windows is faster…and do not tell me that is founded on Linux. When I just tried the Windows xojo with codeweavers crossover I got that the Windows IDE is even with Wine under Windows is faster and more stable than the native Linux Version. It is not to understand why they behave so. It makes problems and errors will not be fixed, development under Linux with xojo is much slower than developing B4J under Linux with Wine emulation.īeside this fact: B4J copy paste works under Linux, xojo not. We will have small Apps in the market but not anymore our core business written in xojo for GUI. I am sad because of the behavior of xojo and their Ideas of development. So we can develop our solutions and do cross platform apps also and have the chance to rework our code for native Android and IOS use. So I decided to switch my Devices away from a xojo standalone Webserver to a B4J Desktop App with Apache Guacamole on Raspberry PI 4 and my customers agreed to change with me. Renamings of commands without any sense behind (msgbox to messagebox) and changing syntax to many different syntax styles you may find in xojo making the business even harder. API2.0 was a real step, Web 2.0 was the next step. Only thing they got was there Idea of programming in basic near Visual Basic. had no Idea what they are doing when they started to change everything in xojo.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |